BatesCarey’s Jordon S. Steinway and Katherine A. Martin were victorious by way of dispositive motion in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida, with the Court ruling as a matter of law that Munich Re had no duty to defend or indemnify its insureds.

BatesCarey partners Matthew Murphy and Ellen Zabinski discussed emerging issues at the annual meeting of the Railroad Insurance Management Association.

Paige M. Houin discuss how the thousands of opioid related lawsuits may impact the insurance and pharmaceutical industries during a Bloomberg webinar on October 8.

BatesCarey is proud to announce partner R. Patrick Bedell was selected as one of Chicago Lawyer Magazine’s 2019 40 Under Forty Illinois Attorneys to Watch.

On October 4, 2019 at the CLM Southeast Conference in in Kissimmee, Florida, Jordan Lowe will participate on a panel discussing Negligent Security and Active Shooter Claims.

Elise D. Allen will address the often misapplied and misunderstood commercial general liability pollution exclusions during a CLE webinar on Thursday, November 7, 2019.

BatesCarey’s David J. Buishas and Mark A. Deptula secured a unanimous ruling in Illinois’ First District Court of Appeals affirming the dismissal of a fraud and breach of contract lawsuit brought by Adrenaline Sports Management, Inc. against Greenlayer LLC in the Circuit Court of Cook County.

BatesCarey’s Ommid C. Farashahi and Jonathan A. Cipriani’s article “No Choice of Law in Delaware Coverage Disputes?” co-authored with Jeremy Salzman and Kylie Tomas of Sompo International was published in The D&O Diary.

BatesCarey’s Adam Fleischer and Allyson Spacht shared insights on the impact of the Cleveland County, Oklahoma District opioid judgment as it relates to nationwide opioid litigation and discussed future coverage considerations in Advisen Front Page News.  

In a case of first impression in Arizona, BatesCarey’s Adam Fleischer and Michael Passman recently obtained summary judgment for Gotham Insurance Company in the Superior Court of Maricopa County where another insurer attempted to hold Gotham responsible for an underlying judgment entered against an alleged predecessor of Gotham’s insured.