On March 6, 2014, David M. Alt spoke at the Claims Litigation Management Conference on "Reservation of Rights and the Insured's Right to Independent Counsel." The conference was part of CLM's ongoing training seminars for insurance professionals. The presentation spanned several topics concerning Independent Counsel, including the proper protocol for acknowledging a claim, assessment of the insurer's duty to defend, the insured's right to independent counsel, state-specific statutory requirements for reservation of rights letters, waiver and estoppel, and bad faith issues. David M. Alt speaks regularly at litigation and insurance conferences, as well as in-house for a number of our insurer clients.

Maria G. Enriquez has been selected as a Top Rated Lawyer in Chicago by the rating service, ALM. ALM rates top lawyers around the nation to be included in a magazine that is distributed with the Wall Street Journal, the American Lawyer, and the National Law Journal, among others. An online version of the magazine will also be available at www.law.com and www.chicagotribune.com. Congratulations Maria!

Savers Prop. & Cas. Ins. Co. v. Indus. Safety & Env’t. Servs. Inc. (N.D. Ind. 2014)

On March 25, 2014, the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Indiana granted summary judgment in favor of our client on a retractive coverage date issue. 

Maria G. Enriquez teaches a section on "Liability Insurance – Defense and Settlement" in a course on Insurance & Regulation at Wake Forest University School of Law. Ms. Enriquez taught for three days concerning defense and settlement issues in connection with insurance issues. She also spoke at a Lunch & Learn at Wake Forest concerning recent developments and topics in insurance law.

Maria G. Enriquez was honored and recognized by Martindale-Hubbell in its Bar Register of Preeminent Women Lawyers. The American Registry at Martindale-Hubbell recognizes and rewards excellence with custom awards based on peer review ratings. Congratulations to Ms. Enriquez!

Confidential

An arbitration panel agreed with BatesCarey LLP's argument that the "follow the fortunes" doctrine did not require a reinsurer to drop down and reinsure any portion of the risk below $1 million, even when the cedent had been required to drop down and pay a loss incepting at less than $1 million. The panel also rejected the cedent's claim for more than $113,000 in interest.

For 2014, Leading Lawyers announced that 11 partners at BatesCarey LLP were leading lawyers in the in the category of insurance coverage. Leading Lawyers is an independent rating service which gathers its list of honorees only after contact with thousands of lawyers in a given state. Lawyers are asked to rate which of their peers they believe comprise the top lawyers in their state in each practice area. Only those lawyers who are most often recommended qualify as Leading Lawyers. This honor is limited to less than five percent of all lawyers licensed to practice law in a given state.

Congratulations to this year's Leading Lawyers:

Robert J. Bates, Jr.
Arthur F. Brandt
Scott L. Carey
Maria G. Enriquez
Stanley V. Figura
Adam H. Fleischer
Maryann C. Hayes
Matthew M. Murphy
Joseph P. Pozen
John E. Rodewald
Mark G. Sheridan

Ellen J. Zabinski and Adam H. Fleischer offer insights and analysis of a number of leading insurance coverage decisions in the environmental realm in their article published in Mealy’s Litigation Report, entitled, Environmental Coverage Summary: 2013.  To review a copy of the article, please click here.

ProSelect Insurance Co. v. Springfield Hospital, Docket No. 227-4-12 (Vt. Sup. Ct. Windsor Unit May 16, 2013)

On May 16, 2013, the Vermont Superior Court, Winsor Unit, held that an insurer could introduce extrinsic evidence in a declaratory judgment action to negate the duty to defend its insured.  The court’s well reasoned opinion provides guidance for insurers grappling with the issue of whether an insurer can introduce extrinsic evidence to negate a duty to defend, and, if so, when.

A federal court in Illinois recently ruled the alleged misuse of Tax Increment Financing Redevelopment Act (the “TIF Act”) monies by the City of Marion, Illinois did not allege covered “loss” under the policy of BatesCarey LLP’s client, U.S. Specialty Insurance Company, even when USSIC withdrew from its initial agreement to provide a defense without a reservation of rights.  City of Marion, Illinois v. U.S. Specialty Insurance Company, Case No. 12-cv-0999-SCW (S.D. Ill.  April 30, 2013).